Category: Reviews

Review: ‘Funny Misshapen Body’

Review: ‘Funny Misshapen Body’

One of the really interesting aspects about the growth in graphic novels is that more and more people are using the form for memoirs and autobiographical works. Will Eisner explored growing up in the tenements, kicking things off, and since then we have had utterly fascinating works that detail romance, aging, life on the streets and the like.

Jeffrey Brown has been mining his experience in numerous works and has made a name for himself with his books, beginning with [[[Clumsy]]], which has been acclaimed since its release in 2005 and has remained in print since Top Shelf acquired rights in 2007. Brown has done short and long works, all with observations on life and work and art. His work has won him numerous accolades and he has even gone on to direct a music video for Death Cab For Cutie.

Before Funny Misshapen Body hit my desk, I knew nothing about Brown. As a result, the book, now available from Touchstone Books, was a window into a new world and one I was pleased to visit. Brown’s growth from doodler to artist no doubt mirrors the journey many working artists took, but watching him lurch from school to work to art was interesting, since they all wound up informing his work.

Brown’s style is a little on the crude side, but he keeps his page design fairly consistent, mostly the six panel grid. He doesn’t try and confuse with pyrotechnics but fills every panel with detail. His simple style manages to convey time, place, and emotion so one is never confused. The lettering could be cleaner and better space for legibility, but there’s an earnest feeling to the drawings, letting us watch him try and fail, finding his way. The story is told in chapters and in a non-chronological way but by the time you finish the 308 pages, you can put the pieces together and see what he has accomplished.

The adversity he faced included his own slacker ways through college, fueled by disinterested and clueless art professors. His diagnosis and handling of Crohn’s Disease is largely confined to one chapter but clearly affected everything that followed. Similarly, we get glimpses at friendships and lovers, all of which were influential but the book keeps returning to Brown’s herky-jerky path towards working as a professional artist. His trial and errors are exposed along with the tremendous support he received from artist Chris Ware.

There are moments of humor and times you shake your head at how stupid he was for wasting so much time getting drunk, but all in all, you find yourself cheering Brown as he found acceptance for his work, and finally a point of view to his artwork that culminates with the arrival of Clumsy from the printer.

For those who aspire to working in the field, this is a good travel guide and for those of us who like to see how others live and learn, this is a good picture of life in the 1990s. The engaging book can turn most into fans of Brown’s work.

Review: ‘Revolutionary Road’ on DVD

Review: ‘Revolutionary Road’ on DVD

America had won World War II, becoming the first true Super Power of the 20th Century. But with it came a price and that was a desperate desire among the populace to preserve their freedom through an amazing sense of conformity. Being different was seen as being un-American and you were likely to be accused of being a Communist, which had replaced being a Nazi as the vilest kind of person.

The spread of television and the broadcaster’s desire to present a harmonious vision of an ideal lifestyle led to a sameness from coast to coast that the country had never experienced before. Nor had the country really seen the rise of suburbia as people commuted by the tens of thousands to jobs in the nearby city, which also had it s affect on society.

Against all of this, Richard Yates wrote the 1961 novel Revolutionary Road that was the first work of fiction to examine the cost this conformity exact from the soul of the individual and society as a while. The acclaimed work had resisted being adapted into film until Kate Winslet campaigned for nearly four years to get the film made by her husband, director Sam Mendes.

The resulting production, coming out Tuesday on DVD, quickly became a critics’ darling, garnering three Academy Award nominations and four Golden Globe nominations. Starring Winslet and Leonardo DiCaprio, it told of the Wheelers and the day they woke up to declare they didn’t want to be trapped by the conformity that was suffocating them.

By 1955, they were married with two children, living in Connecticut while Frank commuted to Manhattan to work at the same business machine firm as his father while April felt suffocated in her perky home. She seized on the notion they should follow Frank’s youthful dream of living in Paris so he could figure out what he really wanted to do with his life. She had the then-radical notion of working to support him while he figured it out and her fervor was such that he initially signed on. As the summer progressed, you could watch his cold feet developing as he turned 30 and appeared to lack the courage to act.

The film does a nice job of showing Frank’s isolation despite being surrounded by an army of men in their gray flannel suits contrasted with April’s loneliness in the house. You see them fiercely trying to maintain their marriage while they each drifted in different directions. When April revealed her pregnancy, it became the moment they seemed to permanently part.

The film nicely realizes 1950s suburbia, from the kinds of appetizers served to company, to the uniformity of business attire in the office. What it fails to do is show them in the greater context of their life. The two children are mere decorations with neither parent apparently having any relationship with them. April seems to have a mere two friends despite her participation, no doubt with the children’s peers and their parents. There’s no real sense of their social circle; instead, we’re told they were a special couple but we’re never shown what that means.

As a result, we’re told a lot but not shown enough to understand how they came together and then violently pulled apart. The dialogue is well done by Justin Haythe and delivered by top performers but ultimately, I’m left with an incomplete portrait. The stars are ably supported with the familiar likes of Jay O. Sanders, Dylan Baker, and Kathy Bates.

Nearly stealing the film out from under them is Michael Shannon’s performance as John Givings, a mentally disturbed adult who acts as the vocal conscience for April and Frank. The madman is the only one to see the hypocrisy of their world which is a metaphor that could have been explored further.

The film needed more to win me over but it’s a riveting drama despite its flaws. The DVD comes complete with a handful of deleted scenes, some of which expanded on the themes but reveal nothing new. The 30 minute Making Of featurette gives lip service to the themes but spends a lot of time on the costuming and set design, all of which contributed to the feeling of isolation.

There’s never a hint that while the couple battled the world they made for themselves, there were others slowly evolving beyond the constraints of the expected. Rock and Roll, the Beat Generation, and the civil rights movement were all bubbling to the surface at the time of the film, and the destination from [[[Revolutionary Road]]] could have been found had they worked together to find it.

Review: ‘[[[Valkyrie]]]’ on DVD

Review: ‘[[[Valkyrie]]]’ on DVD

World War II seems to have generated countless stories about heroism and bravery, stories told for the point of view of the allies and the axis, stories told about life on the homefront and life in the foxhole. As a result, it remains an enduring source of fodder for filmmakers as more and more details come to the surface. Through the 1950s and 1960s, most of the WW II movies were highly fictionalized accounts and by the 1970s war stories were played out, fewer and further between. In the last decade, we’ve had history to sift through and we now know of [[[Schindler’s List]]]. Valkyrie, Bryan Singer’s entry into the pantheon, intended to tell us of the closest a plot to assassinate Hitler came to working.  Presuming you were taught anything about the war in school, you might not even know there were over a dozen attempts to kill the Chancellor of the German Republic.

It’s a story worth telling but it should have been better told. The film was well structured by writers Christopher McQuarrie and Nathan Alexander and Singer is to be commended for shooting on location, which gave the film a great look. The cast, led by Tom Cruise, Kenneth Branagh, Tom Wilkinson, Terence Stamp, Bill Nighy and Eddie Izzard, is to-notch with many performers closely resembling their real world counterparts.

All that was missing was giving a damn about any of these players. The script drained each and every character of personality, sapping the energy out of a story that should have been as compelling as the facts. Colonel Claus von Stauffenberg, credited as the mastermind behind using Hitler’s own Project Valkyrie against him, was actually an outspoken critic of Nazi Germany. He was a brilliant, well-educated man who spoke multiple languages, loved literature and was partial to horses as well as being a family man, raising four children and embarking on his mission while his wife carried their fifth child.

Wish some of that came through beyond perfunctory scenes of him leaving the family to go kill the Führer.  Cruise is restrained but also bland. The others allying himself were also drained of personality so we never understand why everyone revered Ludwig Beck (Stamp), who was actually quite the legendary figure and a reason so many signed up for the July 20 Plot. Instead, Stamp sits around and makes phone calls.

The actual plot is like a [[[Mission: Impossible]]] story with the usual complications but add to this a lack of conviction on the parts of various players, which at first slows and later tips the balance of action on that fateful day in 1944.  It’s fascinating to see the way communications worked back then, and how people had to sit around and wait for the news over the teletype or radio.

In the end, though, we see how the plot failed and what became of the conspirators but by then, their fates leave you unmoved because after nearly two hours you don’t care about any of them.

Instead, you can skip the movie and go the special features on the DVD, now available. There’s the usual Making Of which shows the detail that went into securing the locations and what some of the locale people thought of the production, especially those still alive who recalled that day. But, best of all, is the 42-minute documentary from Kevin Burns that tells a far more compelling story as the children of von Stauffenberg and other conspirators discussed what they remember plus what their lives were like in the years that followed. This made us care and showed an aftermath the film barely acknowledged. The documentary also tells us some 700 people associated with the plot were tried – that’s a much larger scope than implied in the film which would have given the story more impact.

If I were you, I’d rent the disc, skip the film and watch the documentary.

Review: ‘[[[Taken]]]’ on DVD

Review: ‘[[[Taken]]]’ on DVD

No one knew what to make of Taken when it opened in late January and the film garnered largely positive reviews but as the winter dragged on, the Liam Neeson action film took in more and more money. As it hits DVD, the global box office take stands at a robust $220,789,777 and was the feel good movie of the season.

The movie, though, is thoroughly predictable. Liam’s 17-year-old daughter goes to France with a pal and immediately gets kidnapped by a white slavery ring. Former Special Forces (or whatever) Dad flies over and is told he has a mere 96 hours to find her of she vanishes forever. So, we know there will be mayhem, the clock will tick down and he will save her. It’s a modern day Charles Bronson flick. I get that.

The trick is to make the journey an enjoyable one and frankly, it’s so standard that there’s little to be entertained by. Fights, car chases, double-crossing people, been there, seen that.

Neeson is not your first thought as an action star, [[[Star Wars]]]  not withstanding. He’s more the everyman and he wrings your sympathy and you cheer to see him in action, regardless of the predictable outcome.

What would have been a lot more interesting would have been to show us two points of views, not just Liam Neeson’s. The most original thing in the film is the moment he tells her she will in fact be kidnapped. From that point, it would have interesting to see parallel tracks – while Liam Neeson sought his daughter throughout Paris; we also see what Maggie Grace as the daughter had to endure. As it stands, she appears to be the only one who was not drugged, not sold right into street prostitution and by happenstance, the sole virgin capping off an auction for international clientele. That makes her a little too precious and frankly, would have given Grace, a capable actress if too old for the role, something to do other than look terrified or cry.

In fact, other than Neeson, no one is given much of anything to do or so say to round out the story and show us the world Neeson thought he left behind.

Cowritten by Luc Besson ([[[The Professional]]]) and Robert Mark Kamen ([[[The Transporter]]] films), the film felt on autopilot from beginning to end. And with 96 hours to accomplish his task, we’re never given a good sense of when Neeson sleeps, eats, or actually rests. Sure, he’s driven, but he can’t be at his peak for that length of time and the story avoids the issue entirely, a common problem with stories like these. Pierre Morel directs with a nice attention to detail and setting, getting a good, smoldering performance from Neeson but everything else looked pretty much like his Transporter.

The movie comes in the release edition and an extended version that amplified the violence here and there but adds nothing to the story and barely three minutes to running time. The extras are perfunctory with Le “Making Of” featuring everyone gushing over how wonderful everyone else was. The Inside Action: Side by Side Comparisons of six sequences is more interesting.

The stars and crew are all capable of so much more; the overall product is a lackluster affair.

Review: ‘Star Trek Movie Collection’ on Blu-ray

Review: ‘Star Trek Movie Collection’ on Blu-ray

It is most logical for Paramount Home Video to be flooding the shelves with product capitalizing on the release of [[[Star Trek]]]. We’ve been treated to the various Best Of sets, the first season of the original series and now the first six feature films all making their Blu-ray debut. The first question is always, why should I upgrade from DVD to Blu-ray? In the case of the television, there was little doubt. Here, with the films, the answer is less clear cut.

The sextet of films featuring the original crew of the [[[U.S.S. Enterprise]]] was, at best, an uneven affair. It all began when Paramount floundered throughout the 1970s, unsure of how best to capitalize on the growing fan base for the canceled series. It made sense to launch a fourth television network with a revived Star Trek but when that was derailed, it took a while for them to figure out what to do next. George Lucas and [[[Star Wars]]] changed all that. Unfortunately, the corporate handwringing over the next two years meant we were presented with a turgid film that may have featured the cast but lacked the feel of Gene Roddenberry’s series.

The Motion Picture’s costumes were monochromatic bores, much like the performances wrought by director Robert Wise, and the crew were never really given much a chance to show that they still liked one another. Instead, we’re given some new faces to dilute the story and the conflict between the Enterprises new captain, Stephen Collins, and his predecessor, William Shatner, is never fully developed. Nor is the story about Spock and his search for something beyond pure logic. Instead, we’re left gazing at some kinda nice visuals as V’ger comes to menace Earth. It’s slow, ponderous and more than a bit of a mess. For $44 million, Paramount expected something more satisfying and profitable.

Turning the franchise back to the television division and asking for a fresh start with a quarter of the budget was perhaps the most inspired move. Veteran Harve Bennett was given the show to run and did so by combining with director Nicholas Meyer to give us the single best feature of them all. Why? Because it had everything from nifty one-liners from the crew, a philosophical debate over a truly important matter, a memorable villain and a good guest cast.  Killing Spock to accommodate Nimoy also meant the status quo could change which was a good sign.

The next two films, though, suddenly turned the solid [[[Wrath of Khan]]] into the beginning of a trilogy that really doesn’t hang together. [[[The Search for Spock]]]was crafted to allow Leonard Nimoy back on board but did so without
giving us anything but the most stock of Klingon villains. The
philosophical and moral debates from the previous film are gone and
Kirk watches the son he just met die for no obvious reason. Robin
Curtis, replacing Kirstie Alley as Saavik, wasn’t given enough to show
she could be as interesting a character. Nimoy also made a nice debut
as a director although the film felt claustrophobic and shot entirely
on sets which didn’t help.

[[[The Voyage Home]]] wisely changed the tempo and look. Nimoy
grows as a director and the humor is all character-based which is
terrific. The fish out of water theme nicely works as does the
ecological message. A fine way to bring everyone home and reset the
mission parameters.

Of course, Shatner has to be given a shot at directing but his
ham-fisted story development and desire to search for god without
really exploring how everyone views the deity is a notion that arrives
stillborn.  Shoehorning Sybok into the Spock family tree doesn’t help
matters nor does the lackluster performances by the guest cast. And the
humor here is more slapstick than necessary and the supporting cast is
ill-served.

As a result, Meyer was brought back for what everyone acknowledged would be the final original cast film, [[[The Undiscovered Country]]].
Given an opportunity to go out with a bang, the story is strong but the
execution isn’t quite as sharp as it should be. Overall, it was a
pretty fine way to go out, leaving us wanting more.

Today, we get that in the case of the DVDs with hours upon hours of
extras. Most noteworthy among them is the extra disc with a roundtable
discussion between Shatner, Nimoy, Patrick Stewart, Jonathan Frakes and
moderator Whoopi Goldberg. Here’s a preview:

Each disc comes with its own set of extras, many of which are
already included on the DVD versions. New commentaries and featurettes
freshen each film’s experience. I can quibble that Blu-ray should have
allowed Paramount to include both the original Motion Picture
and the more-recently released director’s cut. The discs collect the
High-Def features plus the special two-disc DVD features, so all
together, you get 2.5 hours or so per film of goodies. New commentaries
are added with the previously released comments which could enhance
your enjoyment of the films, although little will improve [[[The Final Frontier]]]. Roberto Orci and Alex Kurtzman, from the new film, provide some fun commentary on [[[The Voyage Home]]].

Each disc has a link to BD Live with additional features such as quizzes.

Of the six films, only the best, The Wrath of Khan was given
a complete restoration. The rest look better merely because they’re
being watched on Blu-ray. All six, though, sound better than thanks to
Dolby TrueHD 7.1. Dialogue, sound effects and score all sound vastly
improved.

While not as good as the original series season one on Blu-ray, it’s
the best these films will look. While the Human Adventure may only be
beginning, the revamping and reworking of the films may well be a work
in progress so either get them now or wait until some undetermined
future date when remastered versions may arrive. The consensus seems to
be that the lack of a director’s cut or slightly modified edits of the
other films may well mean a new and improved set is in Paramount’s
plans.

Review: ‘Sunny Side Down’

Review: ‘Sunny Side Down’

[[[Tales of Mere Existence]]] began as a series of videos beginning in 1999 and now found at YouTube as Levni Yilmaz drew simple cartoons and added a narrative. They were immensely popular and won some awards and now Simon Spotlight Entertainment has released Sunny Side Down, a collection of those cartoons.

The book, the fourth such collection, attempts to humorously take us from birth to old age and the struggles along the way. At first, the early sections were somewhat reminiscent of Jeff Kinney’s [[[Wimpy Kid]]] books but as his cartoon self aged, the material moved into other realms.

He draws in an engagingly simplistic style and he nicely varies the page composition so you don’t get a feeling of sameness. On the other hand, the same cannot be said of the observations. With age comes cynicism and frankly, by the mid-point, as he ponders life after college, the character is downright pathetic, not funny. The material covered here felt familiar, similar themes have been played out on other web comics and even in [[[Doonesbury]]]. Lev seems to be celebrating the slacker lifestyle as opposed to mocking or questioning it.

He looks at types of girls, types of job hunting and shows how sad and pathetic it all is. There’s weariness to his day-to-day existence as he seemingly meanders from home to school to an apartment. There’s no support group of friends or a positive romantic relation, no job that fulfills him even for a month. The pervasive feeling exists from cover to cover and certainly lives up to the title.

In fact, the sense of despair regarding careers and relationships garners some chuckles but taken as a collection, it’s actually a sad commentary that perpetuates stereotypes of an entire generation.

The book’s concluding chapters, the pondering of the future and relevance with advancing years actually covers some fresher territory although the conclusions are fairly bleak.

Yilmaz is a filmmaker who fell into doing the comic material and he seems to have run out of fresh observations because this all felt very familiar. While engaging and entertaining, there’s nothing new to be said here. If you want to sample this for yourself, try the videos before investing in the books.

Review: ‘Saturday Morning Cartoons 1970s Volume One’ on DVD

Review: ‘Saturday Morning Cartoons 1970s Volume One’ on DVD

As the 1970s dawned, I was 12 and no longer as interested in Saturday morning fare. There was Little League which was either in the morning or afternoon and I found myself drifting more towards the [[[Bowery Boys]]] shorts that ran on channel 5 after the cartoons wore themselves out.  My younger siblings watched, but not with the same passion I had shown just a few years earlier.

For me, the Saturday Morning Cartoons: 1970s Vol. 1
, coming tomorrow from Warner Home Video, was more introductory than revisiting my childhood. Having just finished the 1960s volume, it was startling to see how rapidly things had changed. Spies and super-heroes were rapidly supplanted by large gaggles of people either playing music or solving mysteries or both. The disc opens with a cheat, an episode of [[[The Jetsons]]], which may have run in the 1970s for the umpteenth time, but was emblematic of an earlier era, stealing time from something more current.

The success of [[[The Partridge Family]]] in prime time and [[[The Archies]]] on Saturday mornings certainly explained by there was so much music, without a single top 40 tune to emerge from any of these groups.

The mysteries could be ascribed to the wildfire success of [[[Scooby Doo]]], the series that straddled the decades by being introduced in fall 1969 and becoming the most imitated series of the 1970s.

The stories were also vastly different. By 1970, concerns over violence seemed to have begun taming the stories so the level of danger was different. The villains tended to be stupider and more bumbling, prone to slapstick ways of taking themselves out than being subdued by the crime fighters.  Groups of teens were proving to find mysteries, stumbling across problems and then fumbling their way through the investigation until the culprit was exposed and then apprehended as much through dumb luck than effective law enforcement.

Scooby Doo, a series I never warmed to through the years, is represented here in an episode from The New Scooby-Doo Movies that guest-starred the Harlem Globetrotters, which had their series so it was a nice but of cross-promotion. The Globetrotters were at the height of their fame around this time and this was a fun brand extension even if none of the players actually did their own voices, leaving that to the likes of Scatman Crothers. In this case, there are too many people caught up in a fairly mediocre story concluding with the guest stars strutting their stuff on the court, doing things that only work in animation. That it needed a laugh track, cueing kids when to laugh speaks volumes of how unfunny this could get.

We are shown just how many imitators there were with episodes from [[[Goober and the Ghost Chasers]]] and [[[Funky Phantom]]] that also featured groups of teens and their pets solving cases. One thing that was never clear, even after watching these, is why these people were friends. Look at Fred and Daphne, the homecoming King and Queen, who in the real world would have nothing to do with Shaggy or Velma. We’re just presented them as an ensemble and the stories move forward. Goober and Funky Phantom are pale imitations with stock stories, stock characters and even overly familiar voice artists doing variations on their characters, especially the great Daws Butler recycling his Snagglepuss for the Phantom.

Other imitators were [[[Josie and the Pussycats]]] which came in 1970, just two years after The Archies. The music was certainly incidental to the story and this one had a vile Captain Nemo who played an organ coming to hate the pop stars and their music.

The one variation that was weird was [[[Amazing Chan and the Chan Clan]]] which was more a “how done it” than “who done it”. In a nice special feature, actor Jamie Farr talked about the series where he wrote three episodes and explained how the network insisted the Clan each had a distinct personality all had to have something to do and each case featured a song from the children’s band. Oddly entertaining with nice voice work from Keye Luke as the famed Chan.  It’s also interesting to note that a show with a predominantly Asian cast made it to Saturdays before any African-American series.

The Asian influence was also seen with [[[Hong Kong Phooey]]], where a dog working as a janitor at the local police station was also the feared martial arts pooch – reflecting the then hot genre of martial arts films. The animation is among the weakest offerings but had its moments.

An oddity was [[[Yogi’s Gang]]], a show that collected all of the Hanna-Barbera characters from the previous decade and put them on a flying ark. Each episode used different collections of characters, by Yogi, and had adventures. Based on the episode here, the story seems designed to shine the spotlight on each character to say their favorite line or do a character bit. The story, though, had a nifty twist ending which made it satisfying, especially compared with the rest of the stories collected here.

Perhaps the most original series on the two-disc set is [[[Roman Holidays]]] that tried to replicate [[[The Flintstones]]] formula in a Roman era setting. It was about a nuclear family and their exploits – it didn’t look like any of the competition and had some of the best writing, so it’s sad that it lasted a mere 13 episodes.

By the latter part of the decade, Scooby’s imitators were fading fast and CBS was ready to try heroes once more. While ABC was still running[[[Super Friends]]], there hadn’t been much in the way of heroic adventure but in 1977 they hired Filmation to bring back [[[Batman]]] and try their hand at [[[Tarzan]]]. The former featured Adam West and Burt Ward reprising their prime time roles and both needed better direction because they over-emphasized the phrases or sounded constipated rather than dramatic. With cartoon violence even further de-emphasized by this point, actually fighting the criminals was out so the cases were contrived so the Dynamic Duo could triumph over the likes of the Joker with their wits and equipment. They added Bat-Mite for comic relief and it didn’t work at all. Filmation’s animation recycled much of their earlier Bat-efforts and there isn’t much entertainment to be found. Tarzan, with nice design work from Bob Kline, tried to make Edgar Rice Burroughs’ world palatable to kids and it largely worked.

The final extra on the set is a short piece looking at how odd Funky Phantom was with modern day animation folk such as Paul Dini trying to figure out how and more importantly, why it got made.

Here’s a quick preview… enjoy!

Review: ‘Saturday Morning Cartoons 1960s Volume 1’

Review: ‘Saturday Morning Cartoons 1960s Volume 1’

Back in the days after the dinosaurs died out, Saturday mornings meant all three networks would run children’s programming from as early as 7:30 until noon or so. Every fall, as we started a new school year, we eagerly anticipated what new animated fare there might be and were mesmerized by the cartoon antics of anthropomorphic animals, adventurous humans and some downright silly-looking monsters. The baby boomers born at the end of the generation were raised on this diet animated diet as it proved cheaper to produce than live-action fare.

Warner Home Video has collected a wonderful sampling of those shows in Saturday Morning Cartoons: 1960s Vol. 1
, going on sale Tuesday. There are 12 different series presented on two discs, providing me with five hours or reliving my childhood.

Back in the day, with few channels to pick from, we would watch these shows endlessly, repeated throughout the year and then when they went into syndication packages, watch them again. I certainly did with my younger siblings and it was frightening how many of these episodes felt familiar and recognizable.

Wisely, the collection heavily features Hanna-Barbera offerings since they effectively ruled Saturday morning animation. Upstarts such as Filmation, didn’t arrive until 1966 so maybe we’ll see some of those shows in subsequent volumes. Instead, we begin with the enduring figures from The Jetsons to Quick-Draw McGraw.

The earliest offering is The Flintstones, H-B’s biggest hit which actually first aired in prime time and then got recycled on Saturdays beginning in the 1960-1961 season. A year later, Top Cat, another prime time series, moved to Saturdays. Lesser known than Fred and Barney the series used cats led by a finagler, T.C., styled after Phil Silvers. It’s pretty interesting to see Silvers, who immortalized the wheeler-dealer character with his Sgt. Bilko, became the template for more than a few of the characters in these H-B series.

The vocal casts were limited and you began to recognize Don Messick, Mel Blanc, June Foray, Ted Cassidy, and others are they voiced multiple characters throughout the decade. Similarly, H-B’s cartoony style varied little so you got to see stock characters repeated, modified by the addition of a mustache or change in hair color. When the adventure characters come into the spotlight, Alex Toth’s strong design sense comes through again and again.

The shows are not organized in any order but you do get to see pop
culture trends infiltrate the shows, modified for their youthful
audiences. Secret agents followed by super-heroes slowly edged out the
animal exploits so Quick-Draw gave way to Space Ghost.
And with the wild success of Batman on ABC’s prime time schedule, the
latter half of the 1960s featured many a masked hero. Oddly, the
robotic Frankenstein Jr. wore a mask as if a 30-foot tall robot needed
an alter ego. The Herculoids is the latest series in the collection,
debuting in fall 1967 so the social trends that were reflected in
animation will have to wait for volume 2.

Each series is
included as a complete 30-minute installment so the secondary features
that were commonplace back then, are included. For example, 1965’s Atom Ant also had The Hillbilly Bears and Precious Pup, two features with entirely unconnected themes and casts of characters. Heck, I forgot about Precious until I watched.

The episodes selected are certainly some of the strongest offerings from each series such as the introduction of Rosie on The Jetsons or a confrontation with Zorak on Space Ghost
Watching these, you could feel the writers sometimes struggle to make
their simple stories stretch to fill the time allotted. Back then, each
30-minute show ran close to 25 minutes with just a few commercial
breaks. As a result, rather the plot twists or characterization, the
chase scenes got extended or you had long panning shots of space
vehicles or landscapes (such as The Herculoids). The stories
all had beginnings, middles, and ends, and while they may not have been
the strongest stories, at least made some sense.

The oddity in the set was the inclusion of Marine Boy,
a Japanese series, that aired there starting in 1966 and came to
America a few years later but never on Saturday mornings; instead, it
ran in syndication and played weekday afternoons in New York. The
series is a nice touch but the weakest in the bunch given its overly
simplistic story and animation. The classical music soundtrack really
doesn’t fit the series’ look and the character seems entirely
over-dependent on his boomerang (which shouldn’t even work underwater).

I
admit it; these were comfort shows at the advanced age of 50. I see
their flaws today but also recognize that H-B created an enduring set
of players that were unique and fresh and have reason to still be
revived in one form or another today. The two-disc set has several fun
features including bonus episodes of Quick-Draw McGraw and Snooper and
Blabber Mouse. Mini-documentaries celebrate Quick-Draw and the
Herculoids with Paul Dini, Mark Evanier, and Jerry Beck holding forth
with great delight.

The silliest aspect of the set is that, like
the Fleischer Superman cartoons, is labeled “intended for the Adult
Collector and is Not Suitable for Children”. To which I say, hogwash.
Yes, there’s violence – over-the-top, impossible to repeat bits of
business but find this reactionary warning a sad sign of how some
things have not changed for the better.

Here’s a quick preview:

Review: Action Philosophers

Review: Action Philosophers

In a popular and academic marketplace where everyone wants and needs to learn better, smarter, faster, we have series upon series of
things that have titles that are playfully self-deprecating in the hopes of our being brave enough to channel our inner superhero and dive in and learn something that might have seemed a bit daunting, such as [[[Philosophy for Dummies]]] and [[[The Idiot’s Guide to Philosophy]]]. We have Sparks Charts and Cliff Notes. And we have the [[[HarperCollins College Outline of Philosophy]]], Ethics, and other subjects. All worthy aids for the harried and hopeful. But something’s missing. It has been proven in multiple studies that we learn in multi-valent ways, using all the senses, so that the more senses that are engaged in learning and the more playful it is, the better we learn and the better we retain things, no matter what our age or inclination.

Now, I’m a Philosophy Geek and I absolutely love this stuff, but I know it’s not for everyone, can be a hard read and a hard sell, and yet it is still foundationally useful – most headhunters and HR people say that they see a background in Philosophy as a plus for new applicants, as it helps them to be better analytical thinkers, better writers, better communicators, better problem solvers (both the NY Times and Wall Street Journal ran articles on this in the past year). Many of our beloved superheroes are very philosophical (look at [[[Watchmen]]]!). I heartily agree, there, and it’s why the term “classical education,” starting since Plato’s time (4th C. BCE), is still looked upon as something good and useful and the model upon which most modern education is built. After all, can 2500 years be totally wrong? But how to engage more of the senses and assimilate this vast quantity of knowledge in a manageable amount of time and even have fun doing it?

Their three volumes cover everything from the most obscure pre-Socratics to 20th C. America. The series, like Philosophy, itself (save for the 20th-21st Cs.) has a dearth of women – two to be exact: Ayn Rand and Mary Wollstonecraft. And only one native-born American, Joseph Campbell (Rand was an émigré and Jung only came here later in life to teach). The rest are Classical, Continental, and Eastern Philosophers of all the major schools of thought and they read totally like a who’s who. It’s not clear to me, from volume to volume, how the various names were picked and why they were grouped together in these omnibus editions, though within each volume they are chronologically presented. Van Lente’s great talent is to be able to distill down, quite accurately and admirably (I had few quibbles with him, mostly on his takes on the various Christian philosophies, in minor details), the main points of some very complex and mind-bending worldviews, from metaphysics to political science, all with quite the sense of humor, albeit sometimes gallows or black humor. And some of the things aren’t even funny ‘til you look at Dunlavey’s illustrations, which remind me of a cross between Hanna-Barbera and [[[Beavis and Butthead]]], if they’d been done in line drawings, and then you just laugh at the conjunctions.

(more…)

Review: The Eternal Smile by Gene Luen Yang and Derek Kirk Kim

Review: The Eternal Smile by Gene Luen Yang and Derek Kirk Kim

The Eternal Smile: Three Stories
By Gene Luen Yang and Derek Kirk Kim
First Second, May 2009, $16.95

 

Three years ago, Gene Luen Yang’s graphic novel [[[American Born Chinese]]] – a three-stranded partly autobiographical and partly allegorical story of growing up Asian-American – was published to massive acclaim (National Book Award nominee, Michael L. Printz Award winner) and success. And two years before that, Derek Kirk Kim’s debut comics collection, [[[Same Difference and Other Stories]]], was also highly lauded, winning the Eisner, the Ignatz, and the Harvey. But five years before that, Luen and Kim collaborated on a two-issue series for Image called [[[Duncan’s Kingdom]]].

The Eternal Smile collects Duncan’s Kingdom, along with two other stories – [[[Gran’pa Greenbax]]] and [[[the Eternal Smile]]] and [[[Urgent Request]]] – which seem to be new work, though the book never says that specifically. The three stories are held together only loosely by theme; they’re all about escapism and greed, in their own separate ways.

Duncan’s Kingdom is a medieval fantasy – Duncan is a young knight in the service of a king, who is killed by the agents of the (presumably evil, though the plot is so quick and straightforward that a lot of things are left as “presumably”) Frog King on the third page. The Princess declares that whatever knight can kill the Frog King and bring his head back to her will have her hand and be the next king, so Duncan sets out on the quest with his magic sword.

There’s a twist in the story – there would have to be, with such an over-used premise like that – and I’ll be discrete enough not to tell you what it is. But things turn out not to be just what they seem, though Duncan does show more than enough heroism before it’s all done. Duncan’s Kingdom is a bit facile, though, even with the twist – it’s one we’ve all seen a dozen times in earlier stories. This version of the story is told reasonably well, though Duncan never becomes a specific person rather than “our hero.”

(more…)