Review: ‘Captain Action’ #1
I know way too much about comics. Far more than is healthy. But there are, understandably, a few characters here and there that I either know very little about, either because I never really came across them or I did but found them terribly uninteresting and so dismissed them, soon forgetting what I had learned.
[[[Captain Action]]] happens to be such a character. I remembered he first appeared in the 1960s, wore a costume that resembled a futuristic police officer’s with a chest symbol that reminded me to recycle, and was based on an action figure. And that was it. I remembered nothing else. So when I was asked to review the first issue of the new Captain Action series, on sale today, I thought “Perfect. I can truly look at this as a first-time fan and objectively judge if this would be interesting to someone who has no previous knowledge of the character.”
I read it and found it to be a strange mix of too much information at once and not enough.
We begin with a [[[Superman]]]-like character called Savior. His narration explains who he is and reveals that he secretly blew up a place called A.C.T.I.O.N. Directorate. On page two, we find out that half of what we just read is a lie. This is not Savior, but a person disguised as Savior. This is our hero, Captain Action, who crashes into a statue of his father and proceeds to unleash a massive information dump on the readers in a very awkward monologue.
Apparently, there was once a hero called Captain Action (the original guy from the 1960s). The shape-shifter we’ve just met is his son, the new Captain Action, who has the ability to look like other people and copy their abilities, but only for a short time. Exactly how long he can disguise himself and how long afterward he has to wait before he mimics someone again is not made clear.
The new Captain Action wanted nothing to do with the life of a super-hero, despite his powers, but now feels forced to act since his father was killed by a group of super-heroes that an organization called A.C.T.I.O.N. had “created” to defend the Earth. What “created” means is not fully explained. The new Captain Action informs us that these heroes, Savior included, were somehow turned into sleeper agents, thus why they went rogue later. Exactly how they became sleeper agents is not explained, though a group called Red Crawl is blamed. Apparently, Red Crawl was defeated long ago and everyone believed they were dead, except for the original Captain Action. Now they’re back and causing trouble.
After defeating a hero called Green Circle (who is described as having god-like power but doesn’t even put up a fight), the new Captain Action explains the situation to his friends and we’re told this takes an hour. I wish we’d been there for that, as it probably would have cleared things up.
After realizing that the situation is desire and that Red Crawl now controls the Earth, but no one knows it, Captain Action and his colleagues go into a lab where we see a limbless man floating in a tank. They refer to him as Action Boy, and say that he was once Red Crawl’s greatest weapon but will now be their greatest liability. The new Captain Action also mentions he grew up thinking of Action Boy as “uncle.”
So, to review. A hero with mimicry abilities is out to save a world that’s already been conquered and is going to take down Earth’s super-heroes who have gone rogue.
Okay, that’s not a bad premise by itself, but so much of this story is not really explained. We’re tossed all this information about Red Crawl and sleeper agents and all but the details are missing. What is Red Crawl? What is its nature, its ultimate goal? They’ve taken over the world and no one knows it? What does that mean? How was this accomplished?
The original Captain Action is mentioned many times, but no information is given about his mission, his career, how long ago he died, whether or not he had powers. Did he die because of the sleeper agents? Action Boy was presumably his sidekick, but did he have any powers? He must have turned evil later, was it by mind control or by design? Why is he limbless and kept in a lab?
In fact, what the Hell is this “Valhalla Base” where we spend over half of the issue? It has a lab and offices, but what is it’s purpose? How is it connected to the A.C.T.I.O.N. Directorate? For that matter, what is A.C.T.I.O.N.? We aren’t told what it stands for, who it answers to or what its directive is. Are they responsible for all the super-humans on Earth in this fictional universe or are there other super-humans beyond their control? Where are they based? For all I know, this story could take place in either the American Mid-West, Canada or England. There’s no real way you can tell.
The new Captain Action is also not a great character. We don’t know enough about what’s going on in his head or in his heart to really connect to him. We’re not even told his real name (which is why I keep referring to father and son as “old Captain Action” and “new Captain Action”). Our new hero apparently disliked his father because the elder Captain Action was guilting him into using his abilities of mimicry to become a super-hero. Okay, except that we soon learn these powers are actually due to a device, they aren’t an innate ability. So why would the kid feel a responsibility to use the device? Was it more about the legacy of being a hero, with the original Captain Action just hoping his son would be a warrior like him? Why couldn’t Action Boy become the next Captain Action? It would be nice to know. It’s also hard to mourn the elder hero when we don’t even get to see him in flashback nor have any real idea about his career or influence.
On top of all this, I have to say that the dialogue is mostly stiff and awkward. Captain Action’s whole info-dump would have been better as captions rather than him randomly talking to thin air for a couple of pages and then explaining the rest in his head. Even the sound effects are worthy of criticism. Some just don’t make sense. On one page, when Captain Action confronts Green Circle, he raises his fist and we see a WHOOMP sound effect next to him. Except he hasn’t hit the guy yet! So where’s that sound coming from? Did a horse die in the next room over?
I’m not saying everything should be given to the readers in issue 1. I enjoy teasing us with mystery and layers, allowing us to piece clues together over time. But this is not that. We are thrown a ton of information with no real detail or connection and then expected to follow along.
Now, at the beginning of the issue, there is an introduction by Jim Shooter, who plotted the original Captain Action comics in 1968, with fellow creators Wally Wood and Gil Kane. He explains that he was given the character, told that Captain Action had to have Shazam-like abilities, a sidekick named Action Boy, an Action Cave, a special car and a pet panther. He did a couple of issues and soon afterward the character’s title was canceled.
Shooter fails to mention that the character began as a G.I. JOE-esque action figure a year earlier. The action figure was said to by the “9-in-1” hero, having the ability to mimic other heroes. So you could essentially fit fake bodies over him and make him look like Superman, Batman, etc. When DC Comics licensed to do a series about him, they copied all the stuff from the toys (much as Marvel would do for characters such as the Transformers and G.I.JOE years later) but did not maintain the mimicry powers since they didn’t have the rights to some of the characters the guy could shift into (such as Captain America and the Lone Ranger). So they gave him a new power and also finally endowed him with a civilian name and an origin.
In the 1960s comic, Captain Action was said to be Clive Arno, an archeologist who discovered magical coins, each of which would give him the powers of a different mythological god. He and Action Boy would fight evil people such as Dr. Evil, who was actually Captain Action’s insane father-in-law (not kidding). The comic was revived in the 90s and no one seemed to care, so he went away again.
After learning this, I can appreciate the fact that Fabian Nicieza cleverly brought back the character’s ability to mimic other super-heroes. I can also appreciate that he made this a continuation rather than a reboot, with this character being the son of the original incarnation. But that doesn’t change the fact that as a first-time reader with no real knowledge of what came before, there was nothing in this comic that made me want to grab issue 2. Sorry guys.
I guess now you know how I felt when I read your Supergirl history.Post- Kara Zor-el I was lost, too.
Supergirl became somewhat complicated but A, it was explained to us and B, it's not complicated anymore, so I don't entirely agree.But we hashed this out enough last time and I respect your difference of opinion. :-) And if this is indeed how you felt after that article of mine, I'm sorry I didn't make it more reader-friendly.
Chill, dude.I'm just teasing.Captain Action just happened to be my favorite childhood toy.I find the revival interesting.DC wasn't interested at all in recollecting the series into a trade a while ago when I suggested it.I hear they may be having a change of heart.Who knows.
"Chill dude, I was just teasing."Oh, I know, man. That's why I had a smiley face. :-) I'm just bustin' yer chops a little.I have no real opinion on the toy or the original comic since I didn't delve into them. I just know that this particular issue filled me with apathy. But like I said, a guy who can mimic the appearance and powers of other heroes is definitely something that could be fun. If this series changes direction or if DC collects the old stuff, I'll definitely give it a look-see. It's still early enough in the series for it all to be turned around.
Having bought the original comics off the spinner racks when I was a kid I love them regardless of their clunkiness.I was beginning to recognize art styles and the names Wally Wood and Gil Kane meant something to me.Given what it would take legally, we'll never see the likes of that kind of toy again.
Rick,'Given what it would take legally, we'll never see the likes of that kind of toy again.'A few years ago there was a major Captain Action remake from a company called Praying Mantis. After a few kinks were worked out the figures were very well done. That said they did manage to get quite a few big name licenses. No Marvel or DC but some good ones The Lone Ranger and Green Hornet among them. The sales were terrible so the line did not last long at all BUT- I brought every single thing I could. Captain Action is the single greatest toy from my childhood. Look I LOVE GI JOE (the original GI Joe) but Captain Action means more to me than even Joe. Yes…even…Joe. That's hard for me to say considering that Don Levine (Joe's creator) is a friend of mine, and a GREAT guy. But Captain Action is just all that. Mike Eury and I almost eloped we we found out we were both Captain Action fans. For anyone interested Mike also wrote a book on Captain Action that is really cool. You should still be able to get it on Amazon. True story-a couple of weeks ago there was a real possibility that one of the L.A. fires may have reached my home. I made a mental note that if it did the FIRST thing I would have saved was my original MINT Captain Action and Action Boy. Sorry Don…
I bought CA #0, which explains what happens/happened to "old" Captain Action. I saw #1 at my store today, flipped through it, saw that only half the book was CA and the rest was a story of what looks like a Mandrake/Zatara ripoff so, I put it back. For $3.99 the whole book should be about CA.
It isn't a Mandrake ripoff, it actually IS Mandrake! The first new comic book story featuring Mandrake in over a decade! I don't have the issue, but is it really split 50/50 between CA and Mandrake? I thought the Mandrake story would be a 6-page filler or something like that.
Alan,You know I feel you on the review, but strangely enough what you wrote makes me want to read the book. Or…I'm just a WHORE for the Captain. Either way thanks for the review.
Michael – Me too. I have all the original stuff except the the Dr. Evil Headquarters and the lab set. Even have all 4 of the 'Super Queens' (no, not THAT kind of QUEEN!) and I have a few of the Japanese Henshin Cyborg toys. It was my favorite toy as a kid.
Michael – The Playing Mantis stuff was fun. Considering we got more bad guys and FINALLY Kato but the line didn't have the likes of Superman, Batman or Spider-man. It didn't keep my from trading my DC comps for the whole line at a NY comics store. But I'm with you. CA was my admiration. This toy was really great for this budding comics fan. Many happy hours in my room having CA dressed as Superman rescuing my sister's Barbie from a burning building or fighting my Remco Lost In Space robot.I'm actually with Alan on this. Recent attempts to revive the character may be confusing or fall short, but nothing beats those happy childhood memories.
Rick-I have two (count them) Two Silver Streaks. And a couple of Dr.Evil's but NONE of the Super Queens. I never got into those. Hey do you have any of the Marx's 'Best Of The West' toys. I don't know anybody who collects those. Man it would be cool to talk to someone about that.
Michael – Two Silver Streaks!I have a 'Quick Change Chamber' which is rare AND fragile but it's in really great shape.As a kid I saw the Super Queens in a Sears outlet in Grosse Pointe Farms where I lived. The first thing I recall was that Murphy Anderson did the box art (like the Action Boy costumes). They were marked down and I should have bought them right then and there. But 'boys didn't buy dolls'. TELL that to me now.The Wonder Woman with a Captain America's shield and the Supergirl with Krypto crack me up.I don't have any 'Best of the West' toys but have come really close to getting the Noble Knight and the Vikings a few times.Seems to me like Chuck Dixon and/or Beau Smith were at least into the Marx playsets (the tin castles/fort, etc.) that had the smaller figures,They might either be into the bigger figures or know someone who is.
Thanks Rick! I will reach out to Mr.Dixon and Mr. Smith when I have a moment.
Well, I'm just here to convey my thoughts, not to convince people to agree with me, so if you wanna grab it, more power to you. :-) Like I said, good premise, I just didn't like the execution.
Alan-I guess you didn't read the Preview issue #0 because it sets up this #1 issue and there is also a 2 page text piece included in issue #0 that gives the history of Captain Action as both a toy and comic book character. Further, the back story of Original Cap was deepened in our First Mission , Last Day Novella which came out in July. Fabian Nicieza wrote this to be a short 50 page arc spread out over 5 issues in sort of a cliff hanger fashion. Beyond Issue 5 you'll see more pages of Cap! We also have back up stories of classic Cap, Action Boy and our new character Lady Action coming down the pike, and cover artist the likes of Dick Giordano, Thomas Yeates, Dan Spiegle, Ed Hannigan, Edwardo Bareto, and Ron Frenz just to name a few!Stay tuned!Joe AhearnCA Enterprises, LLC
Alan – You thoughts are perfectly valid.Every time this much-remembered character has made a 'return' it has seemed more and more out of step with things.Hence the fanboy gushings of Michael and myself about how much we loved the original toy.I respect your opinion and will probably steer clear of the comic. I do wish the Moonstone guys luck with their book.For me, Captain Action is best frozen in time, stuck in the 60's in that room I shared with my younger brother on 458 Shelbourne Court, Grosse Pointe Farms, Michigan with all my my comics and me.