Dennis O’Neil: Comic Books Even Teachers Can Love
That was the headline above a New York Times story that ran in the paper’s Art section…
Hold on! Before we go any further, let’s think about this. The Times headline implies that at least a substantial number of teachers don’t like comics. Not true, at least not in my experience. Marifran, who taught for 50 years, used comics I brought home as classroom prizes in both a Catholic school in Brooklyn and a public school here in Nyack. She got no negative feedback from either parents or school officials. And the kids seemed to like being rewarded in this way. Comics were a small but welcome addition to her workplaces.
Then why did the august gray lady of American journalism imply that comics and lesson plans might be a bad mix? Maybe because once upon a time, somewhere in the neighborhood of 60 years ago, comics did have a bum rep among certain citizens, probably including teachers, especially those who read editorials, heeded clergy and other authority figures, including a New York City psychiatrist. And, while we’re on the subject of authority figures, these citizens thought that if United States congressmen said something was a menace to our youth and even convened hearings to investigate, well, by golly, it was a menace, whatever it was.
As far as I can tell, comic books’ days as scapegoats and quarries of witch hunts were pretty much done by the late 50s and early 60s, when Julius Schwartz refashioned a lot of long dormant superheroes and Stan Lee changed editorial attitudes and gave comics an aura of hipness and, dare we utter it, of sophistication. But sometimes old convictions refuse to die, especially if those holding the convictions have no reason to question them. So, yeah, I’m sure there still exist folk who believe comic books to be venues for wickedness, but there can’t be many of them.
Which brings us back to the Times piece. It concerns a new publishing venture, Toon Graphics, and its founder, Francoise Moulay. Ms Moulay is offering comics to schools as tools to help kids learn. She believes that comics can help teach reading because youngsters, unlike adults, because they are used to extract meaning from information. “That’s how they make sense of the world,” Ms Moulay told the Times reporter. “Comics are good diagrams for how to extract meaning from print.”
That makes comics a natural extension of what psychologists say is something infants do before very early in life, make crude, preverbal narratives – stories – to deal with the continual barrage of information their senses are providing. They begin to assemble cause-and-effect scenarios and soon all that… stuff isn’t so scary because they’ve begun to understand it. Then they grow up and acquire language and… well, it can go a lot of ways from there. Maybe they write King Lear. Or go to work for the New York Times. Or contribute to ComicMix.
Edit: Françoise Mouly
(Yes, I was “that kid” who would correct the teacher/instructor/sensei. Dick Cavett would tell the teacher a mistake was made, but not tell the teacher what the mistake was.)
Toon Graphics are the “big kids” imprint of Toon Books.
Toon Books are designed for beginning readers.
Yes. That headline is as bad as the “BIF POW BAM” headlines of the last millennium. Librarians have been using comics since the late 1990s. (Your former employer, DC Comics, partnered with the New York Public Library then to test the market with copies of Batman, Books of Magic, and Death.)
Furthermore, ever since the World Wide Web, words and pictures have intermixed tremendously, so this new literacy is rather important. Teachers know how to use comics to get reluctant readers to read (and to challenge the smart kids to “read up”).
And if teachers don’t realize that, just slap them upside the head with a copy of “Wimpy Kid”.
As for the book burners, they still exist.
Captain Underpants is the #1 censored book in libraries.