When Vampires Suck: a review of ‘How to Catch and Keep a Vampire’
Diana Laurence’s How to Catch and Keep a Vampire: A Step-By-Step Guide to Loving the Bad and the Beautiful
(Sellers Publishing, 10/23/09, $14.95 trade
paperback) is advertised as non-fiction and humor. It’s 160 pages, complete
with FAQs, myth busting, case studies, cutesiness with perhaps a nod to Sex and the City, references to the
latest vampire crazes (True Blood and
Twilight), and an underlying
cautionary tale (the danger of the serial-killer-turned-vamp-professor, Dr.
John Grey) of female stupidity, to-turn-or-not-to-turn angst between Diana and
her vamp paramour Connor, and redemption. It tries to be many things.
I kept
wanting to like it. I love vamp lit. I’m published in the sub-genre several
times over and love to play in that playground. I’ve watched the suckers ever
since I was a little girl and first saw Bela Lugosi as The Count and said,
“Oooh! He’s cool! He wears capes and goes to the opera!” and lusted after
Frank Langella and loved Rice’s The
Vampire Lestat (and I’m an adult, so I despise Twilight – vampires don’t sparkle!) and can geeble with the best of
them over Vampire Bill and his delicious-but-inaccurate accent! So I get the
whole fascination-not-fear idea and how that can be played for amusement. We
are not amused.
Laurence’s vamps tend toward the True Blood variety, but with added bonuses. Yes, they drink real
blood and synthblood, but they can also eat and they have a drink called Light
Shade that enables them to walk in the sun plus an elixir that makes their pale
skin more normal looking. They aren’t damned, but are immortal (societal
prejudice smear campaign). Flying is merely hypnosis on their victims – they
don’t do it. They used to sleep in coffins out of superstition but don’t,
anymore. They don’t shape shift – more myth and hypnosis. The worst parts
about being a vamp seem to be that they can’t use mirrors and the alienation
they have from loved ones due to prejudice and the mere fact that the vamp will
live forever (barring staking) and other types of humans won’t (oh yeah,
they’re human…they have souls!). Oh, and if you drink a vamp’s blood but are
caught in time, you can be drained of all your now tainted blood, have it
replaced with synth blood ‘til they can get your proper blood type, and prevent
a turning before it’s acted upon all your blood cells and they’ve acted upon
the rest of the cells in your body. But it has to be done fast.
It’s all just a bit too neat and tidy and convenient
and…well…flat. It should be seductive, like its subject. It’s not. Dry. How
can you make talking about vampires, one of the most fun subjects in the world
(every culture has a type of vampire myth!), boring? This manages. Not quite
sure how. But it does. And that sucks. Excuse the bad pun. I just couldn’t
help myself.
Hi Alexandra! I like to thank all the reviewers who take the time to do reviews of my book, and even though this is the first negative review it has received, I wanted to anyway! Just as with vampires, it takes all kinds to make a world, and I respect your opinion. Thanks for putting in the time to read it and post about it. You did do a great job summarizing this particular book's take on vampire lore and rules. Sorry it was not more fun for you–but a reviewer's job is sometimes that way, which I why I'm glad to be an author and not a reviewer. LOL Have a Happy Halloween!
Fancy meeting you here, Diana. ;-> I do hesitate to post negative reviews and I'm glad you have a healthy attitude about the whole thing. I'm not just a reviewer. I'm a writer, too, so I like to see everyone succeed — more fun for all and better for the genre(s)! And I wish I could've said more specifically why it didn't spark, for me, but it was just that. Still, congrats on publication and other positive reviews in a genre I love and happy sales! Ciao! –Alexandra
Thanks, Alexandra! Best to you in your writing career as well.