L.A. and Vegas Vying for Comic-Con

Van Jensen

Van Jensen is a former crime reporter turned comic book writer. In addition to ComicMix, he contributes to Publishers Weekly and Comic Book Resources. He lives in Atlanta, and his blog can be found at graphicfiction.wordpress.com.

You may also like...

5 Responses

  1. Vinnie Bartilucci says:

    I'd be curious to see how comics fans respond to the idea of the convention being in Vegas. I have a feeling many of the hardcore fans wouldn't go near the gaming tables (hell, they rarely leave the con floor to eat, let alone gamble), thus rendering the real reason Vegas tries to attract conventions and visitors pointless. Having the con in LA would likely make Hollywood's participation in the show that much stronger, since it'd be in their backyard. That could, of course, be either good…or bad.San Diego is in a precarious position. To the best of my knowledge, they have no other convention or event even CLOSE to the size of the SDCC all year. The choice they're faced with is, is it worth expanding the convention center to accomodate one show, with the risk of that extra space laying fallow the rest of the year? They'd have to spend a lot more time and money filling that extra capacity to make it truly pay. Add to that the traffic issues as all those fans pour into the (too small) highways leading there I doubt San Diego is going to build new highways to make one show happy. Of course, both of those changes could well turn SD into a good city to hold events in again.Maybe San Diego's Mayor will come to regret his offhanded comments about "people with real talent" after last year's con after all.

  2. Alan Coil says:

    Comics already had a convention in Vegas. It SUCKED. It sucked so bad that the retailers all took time to learn to play Texas Holdem between customers, and then had a tournament.Vegas sits in the middle of the desert because the original builders wanted to be any place other than where dweebs were.

  3. John Tebbel says:

    To quote Dan Blocker, "Anaheim?"Remember the source? Send your guess to GeezerNews, care of this station.

  4. Michael Davis says:

    L.A.? O H H E L L NO!!!! I live (most of year) in L.A. it's a HORRIBLE place to have a convention. JUST HORRIBLE. You can FORGET any type of night time flow in L.A. You can FORGET hanging outside the hotels to the wee hours. You can FORGET anything being OPEN after 2am. You can forget feeling welcome as we are in San Diego. You can FORGET feeling safe downtown. You can FORGET wearing any type of costume that has a fake weapon on it. This city JUST SUCKS when it comes to conventions, SUCK SUCK SUCKITY SUCK! Shit I could write an entire article-wait-an entire BOOK on why I would rather have the con in Iraq than L.A.I hate Vegas also but they do know how to host an convention. I think that the SDCC has enough clout to get San Diego to do whatever it would take to stay. Trust me if the con moves to L.A. that will END the era of the con as a place for fans and professionals it will become a place where people go away year TO SUCK.

    • Michael Davis says:

      I meant it will become a place where people go away EVERY year TO SUCK.SUCK SUCK SUCKITY SUCK!SUCK SUCK SUCKITY SUCK!SUCK SUCK SUCKITY SUCK!SUCK SUCK SUCKITY SUCK!SUCK SUCK SUCKITY SUCK!SUCK SUCK SUCKITY SUCK!SUCK!