Review: ‘Wanted’
Reviewing Wanted
, the film based on the Top Cow miniseries by Mark Millar and J.G. Jones, is a difficult request. Directed by Timur Bekmambetov, the film is enjoyable, but solely on a puerile level, and undoubtedly not for the reasons that Bekmambetov intended. This movie is exactly what would happen if a hyperactive 16-year-old was given free range to write a script; it features an Angelina Jolie butt-shot, bullets that don’t travel at normal speed or in a straight line, and the euphoria of telling off your boss and all the jerks at work. But when asked if this film is actually any good, or even a good comic adaptation, the answer is a strong “No.”
Those of you who remember the comic series remember a truly raunchy adventure about an assassin named Fox who recruits a cubical jockey to take his father’s place in a secret society of supervillains known as The Fraternity. From there, we get a few twists and turns thrown our way, but primarily, this was a comic book about all things comic books: superheroes, villains with puffy capes, a cannibal baddie, and even a few digs on other genre flops like Adam West’s Batman.
With that in mind, the movie takes its own liberties, and generously at that. Replace “supervillains” with “assassins,” “puffy capes” with “bullets that curve,” and “cannibal” with Morgan Freeman. It is totally understandable how this movie was sold, because people are so afraid of doing superhero films that don’t have names like “[[[Iron Man]]]” or “[[[Batman]]]” attached to them, so instead they were going for a Matrix redux, and failed miserably.
[[[Wanted]]] took gravity and physics and threw them both out the window in order to pull of these ridiculous action sequences. In a world like that of [[[Matrix]]], bending bullets and time was believable, as our reality was established as nothing more than a computer program. Here, the reason a car is able to flip around like a kitten is simply because this group of assassins can get their heart rate up to 400 beats per minute, which allows them to become hyper perceptive. This is all that’s provided as explanation for being able to drive a car into the side of a bus, then drive away, seemingly unscathed.
The acting in this film is almost not worthy of a mention. Morgan Freeman has essentially become a brand name, much like Christopher Walken or Mickey Rourke. Adding a name like Freeman will change the feel of the written character, and instead make it “Wanted with Morgan Freeman.” Angelina is essentially playing the exact same character as in Mr. and Mrs. Smith: the sultry/mysterious/dead-behind-the-eyes look that, for some reason, makes men everywhere swoon. The rest of the cast falls in the category of extraneous, including a bizarre cameo by Terrance Stamp, who does not eat people, nor ask anyone to kneel before him.
Another big problem with the adaptation from the comic series is the morality of our protagonist. Wesley Gibson steals, maims and rapes in the book, while in the film we get a whiney, almost “Anakin-esque” performance from James McAvoy. The story almost forces us to feel for his plight, mostly because Hollywood has yet to perfect the concept of the anti-hero just yet.
Our last big issue comes in the ending. Mark Millar is a big proprietor in his books of shocking his readers, and that left the last couple of lines in the comic book having our protagonist essentially berate the reader, explaining why this story makes him better than all of us. This was slightly frustrating, but still fun to have a comic book break the fourth wall and analyze the reader.
While this worked so well in the comic, it fell flat in the film. Like previously mentioned, the powers-that-be softened up McAvoy’s Gibson, making us empathize with his sad life. To then have him turn around in the end and look right into the camera and call the audience pathetic only confused and infuriated the audience. A poor move.
Finally, this film is exactly what NOT to do when adapting an independent comic book for film. One needs to stick to the “do it right or don’t do it at all” theory, instead of doing things like replacing super villains with assassins because “it’s more believable.” I dread to think of what changes would happen if they were to adapt Millar’s new Kick Ass book similarly. Instead of a teenager who learns to fight crime the hard way and suffers a few brutal beatings before becoming a hero, would the Hollywood version feature have him “step up” and break-dance his way into the heart of America?
RATING: 5/10
I had only a mild interest in seeing "Wanted" before this review. Some of the Matrix-ish camera work was intriguing and the fact that it was adapted from a comic book. But, other than that, not much to catch my interest here. Now, I think I can miss it. At least until it gets cut and run on TNT.What will keep me away from this movie more than Rick's review is the poster. Specifically, Angelina Jolie's elbow. Here we have a woman who has starred in several high profile action pictures. "The Tomb Raiders," "Mr. and Mrs. Smith" and now "Wanted." You can make the case that Jolie is currently the biggest female action star in the movies. And she is frighteningly skinny. I know, it's terribly sexist of me to just focus on a woman's body. Even more, just one aspect of her body. But LOOK at Ms. Jolie's forearm in this poster. It is the centerpiece of this image. Except for the cryptic tattoos, this arm does not imply power, this arm doesn't even imply feminine grace. This looks like one of those "reality shots" from an After-School Special on Anorexia Nervosa.I can't say that Angelina is anorexic. She might just be naturally thin. It happens. But this is not a body that says, "I'm an action star!" Maybe that is part of Ms. Jolie's appeal in an action movie, that odd juxtaposition of strength and power, next to a body that looks like it would blow away in a strong breeze.There is no questioning Angelina Jolie's beauty, her intense stare or her acting chops. She's a fine and beautiful actor. But how many times have we seen shots of how much muscle Toby McGuire added to play Spider-man convincingly. "Electra" may have been a crappy movie, but I can buy Jennifer Garner as a powerful woman.I wish the aesthetic for female action stars was more, "Wow, she put on a LOT of muscle for this role," and less, "Wow, she certainly slimmed down for this one!"
When the camera looks at her face straight on, Jolie is beginning to get that skull outline that women who are too obsessed with excercise get. I call it the Madonna Death Mask effect.
Rick, you forgot to mention that all the "amazing" stunts looked really CGI. For example, the action on top of the subway felt like what it was, the actors were on a green screen stage somewhere. Compared to the Spidey/Doc Ock train fight in Spider-Man 2 where it felt really exciting and dangerous.
Ack. Looks like I made a slight mistake in my rush to get this on the site amid all of the Chicago chaos. The review was actually written by Matt Raub, our resident movie marksman.My apologies, Matt! Blame it on the convention hub-bub!
Matt, thanks for clearing up my confusion with your review. I thought I had read this comic but could not get my recollections to jibe with what I was hearing about the movie. I am relived to see I am not losing my mind (at least not over this). I really have no desire to see this movie now.
Thanks for this review. You have summed up all of my frustrations on this one. I am a huge fan of the comic and when I heard they were leaving the supervillians out, I couldn't believe it. I went to a panel at the New York Comic Con with Bekmambetov and one of the first questions asked was why aren't they in costumes? His answer was, "Assassins don't want to be noticed." I wanted to scream out, " They're not assassins!" And they don't wear costumes all the time just in their underground lair. It would have been such a great movie if they had stuck to the original idea. I thought the success of 300 and Sin City had proven to film makers that for comic book movies, the closer you stay to the source material the better.