Comments (7)

Add a CommentInappropriate or promotional comments may be removed.

Reply
Keith R.A. DeCandido (10:00 AM on Tue Oct 27, 2009)

The Barry Nelson television version, the Casino Royale satire, and Never Say Never Again are omitted - consider this the canonical Bond reference book

Hardly that, since it doesn't discuss the Ian Fleming novels -- that is the canon of James Bond. The films are all derivative works. And a reference source that omits things loses value as a reference source, so I'd consider the lack of the TV show, the satire, and NSNA to be a major flaw.

Reply
mike weber (10:40 AM on Tue Oct 27, 2009)

Speaking of "...the buffoonery that was Moonraker..." - not surprisung sinc half or more of Moonraker - the Rio sequence, for instance - is an uncredited remake of a sp spoof made by diLaurentis at Cinecitta, starring Terry-Thomas, Mike Connors, Dorothy Provine and Raf Vallone. (Some scenes - the scene in which Bond and the girl show off their various lethal gadgets, for instance - are virtually shot-for-shot, except that Mike Connors was the CIA agent and Provine was the Brit. And Provine had a Rolls-Royce that was more impressive than any other Roller i've seen in a flim since FAB 1.)

Reply
mike weber (8:38 AM on Wed Oct 28, 2009)

Ah. I forgot to mention that the film i was referring to is "Kiss the Girls and Make Them Die", or that, the last time i looked, it was unavailable in any format.

Reply
mike weber (10:42 AM on Tue Oct 27, 2009)

As to omitting the books - this is a book about the populat culture phenomenon - and i would guess that a huge portion of people who could be called "Bond fans" aren't even aware that Paul was in a band before Wings ... i mean, that there even were books.

And couldn't care less, because they'd never do anything so silly as read a whole book.

Reply
Donald Symanski (7:59 PM on Tue Oct 27, 2009)

Actually I find this "updated" book - just like the previous edition - rather boring and lacking any real insight or new information. I went through it and found all the same superficialities..it's just a glorified picture book (pictures which we've already seen a million times).

For my money, there are far better James Bond books out there that are way more interesting and informative. This is just another weak rehash of far superior James Bond film books.

Reply
Steve Chaput (9:51 PM on Tue Oct 27, 2009)

I'm going to agree with others that any 'encyclopedia' that confines itself only to films considered canon, doesn't discuss the novels and other items really doesn't live up to the name. Rather it was titled the "Official James Bond Film Companion" or some such would have been more honest. I'm assuming it also doesn't mention the one-shot DC comic?

Reply
Birmy (1:27 PM on Tue Oct 27, 2009)

It may have been a condition of EON's compliance with the project to omit Bond projects they weren't affiliated with, especially the contentious "Never Say Never Again." It strikes me as the Broccolis just maintaining their tight grip on the franchise.

Add a comment

Inappropriate or promotional comments may be removed. To create a clickable link, simply type the URL (including http://) and we will make a link for you. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br> tags, but if you're into that kind of thing, you can use any of the following tags: b, i, strong, em, a (href only), p and br.

Click one of the three commenter types below. Member comments are added immediately once you confirm your email address. Anonymous comments are moderated by our editorial staff.

Email me

  

Comment Preview
Avatar
Anonymous (11:55 PM on Fri Nov 20, 2009)

Preview your comment here.

Read our comics -- for free!


Active Conversations

ComicMix Features

Articles by contributor

ComicMix Podcasts

this gets replaced with a player
Κ ΚΚΚΚ ΚΚΚΚ