Comments (8)

Add a CommentInappropriate or promotional comments may be removed.

Reply
Linda Gold (5:40 PM on Sun Aug 10, 2008)

Bob- adjusted for inflation what comes in 2nd to GWTW?

Reply
Russ Rogers (11:34 PM on Sun Aug 10, 2008)

Star Wars. http://www.boxofficemojo.com/alltime/adjusted.htm

1 Gone with the Wind
2 Star Wars
3 The Sound of Music
4 E.T.: The Extra-Terrestrial
5 The Ten Commandments
6 Titanic
7 Jaws
8 Doctor Zhivago
9 The Exorcist
10 Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs

Reply
Linda Gold (11:36 PM on Sun Aug 10, 2008)

Thanks Russ!

Reply
Mike Gold (5:28 PM on Mon Aug 11, 2008)

Hmmm. Go figure. I actually sort of like ONE of those ten!

Reply
John Tebbel (10:22 AM on Mon Aug 11, 2008)

Mojo's all-time chart would be more useful if it didn't include re-release money; different companies had different re-release strategies.

Reply
Vinnie Bartilucci (10:54 AM on Mon Aug 11, 2008)

More than the box office totals, the number that Hollywood cares about is the rerurn on investment. A film that makes 200 million sounds like a hit, until you realize that it may have cost more than that to make. Pineapple Express was made for a micro-milli-squidgeon of that, and it may well have already re-made its budget and turned a profit by now.

Yes, the big-budget films will usually draw bigger box office, but its the little films made on a shoestring that turn massive profits (My Big Fat Greek Wedding is the last one I can think of) are the ones that turn Hollywood's head. Alas, it's becoming harder and harder to draw people to films that don't have more explosions than emotions.

Reply
Mike Gold (5:32 PM on Mon Aug 11, 2008)

Sure, but you've also got to look at DVD, cable, pay per view, online rental, broadcast, licensing (if any) and -- most important -- foreign revenues. A movie that cost $200 million to make but brought in only $150 million in first North American release could have made another $150 million in foreign (not at all unusual for foreign to match North American, and sometimes exceed it) and even the same amount in all those other markets.

This explains why they do sequels to movies that didn't do all that well the first time around. Hellboy I did okay in initial release, but it did awesome on DVD and these other venues.

Reply
Russ Rogers (5:54 PM on Mon Aug 11, 2008)

It was the perennial VHS and DVD revenues of "Labyrinth" and "Dark Crystal" that convinced studios to invest money in "Mirrormask." Labyrinth and Dark Crystal had been considered box office and financial failures until somebody in accounting started adding up the numbers that had accumulated over the years. I know "Mirrormask" cost next to nothing to make. I wonder how the Bean Counters think of it. Certainly Gaiman has become a bankable Hollywood commodity with "Stardust" and "Beowulf." Now, "Coraline" is getting the big star, 3-D animation treatment. And Gaiman's tapped to write "Doctor Strange."

Add a comment

Inappropriate or promotional comments may be removed. To create a clickable link, simply type the URL (including http://) and we will make a link for you. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br> tags, but if you're into that kind of thing, you can use any of the following tags: b, i, strong, em, a (href only), p and br.

Click one of the three commenter types below. Member comments are added immediately once you confirm your email address. Anonymous comments are moderated by our editorial staff.

Email me

  

Comment Preview
Avatar
Anonymous (10:46 AM on Thu Nov 20, 2008)

Preview your comment here.

Active Conversations

ComicMix Podcasts

this gets replaced with a player