Fri Jul 18, 2008 3:17PM4 comments ›
Fri Jul 18, 2008 — by Van Jensen
Alan Moore Talks About 'League,' 'Watchmen'
'Moore simply wants to be left alone'
Alan Moore talks movies over at Entertainment Weekly, and -- surprise, surprise -- he remains not so thrilled about the adaptations of his work.
Here's a particularly good exchange on his falling-out with DC:
Has Warner Bros. tried to contact you about Watchmen?
No, they've all been told not to. They get the message.... I don't want anyone who works for DC comic books to contact me ever again, or I'll change my number.... And I only started to get upset when I found out they [DC Comics] were trying to rob me of a couple thousand pounds. It was over the Watchmen merchandising back in the '80s, and they kind of eventually said, Oh, yeah, I suppose you do deserve this money. But by that time the damage was done. The only reason I ended up working for them again, during the ABC period from '99-'04, [was because] I had already signed the contracts. [Editor's note: DC Comics President and Publisher Paul Levitz responds: ''We've had our disagreements with Alan over the years, but we remain great fans of his talent and would be happy to work with him in the future if he's ever inclined.'']
It's a massive interview, five pages, and covers an array of other topics as well film properties. Here's some background on his upcoming League of Extraordinary Gentlemen: Century, which will be published next year by Top Shelf:
The first book surrounds the coronation of King George, which was also the time The Threepenny Opera was set, a comet was passing overhead, and there was a general feeling of dread in the air. We're also focusing on the occult fictions written around the time...[like] Aleister Crowley's [1917] book, Moonchild, where the protagonists are attempting to create a magically produced child that is going to usher in a new era. [Protagonist] Mina and her associates are trying to stop this from happening. The second book [revolves around] that sort of peculiar 1960s melding of pop-star psychedelic lifestyles, fashionable interest in occultism, and to some degree, at least in London, crime. We've got it all centered around a big rock concert at Hyde Park. Running all the way through this is the continuing threat of the production of a magical child who, by this time, we are fairly certain, is the Antichrist. That second book ends very badly. And they're not having a lot of luck. The third part is set in 2008 when, basically, the League is in pieces — barely exists anymore — and this turns out to be the time at which the Antichrist project finally pays off, and this magical child finally manifests in quite a terrifying form.
Jump to comments (4) ![]()
More News from ComicMix
- The Point Radio: 'Twilight New Moon' Exclusives1 day ago, 0 comments
- Review: 'Saga of the Swamp Thing Book Two'1 day ago, 0 comments
- Why continuity matters, dammit1 day ago, 4 comments
- Capcom Announces 'Resident Evil 5: Gold Edition'1 day ago, 0 comments
- 'Angel: After The Fall' fan film3 days ago, 0 comments
- ComicMix Six: Best Geek-Themed Games for the Holidays3 days ago, 1 comment
- Review: 'Logan's Run' on Blu-ray3 days ago, 0 comments
- ComicMix and IDW on the iPhone and iTouch4 days ago, 0 comments
- 'Global Frequency' back to TV?4 days ago, 3 comments
- Review: 'Kevin Smith 3-Movie Collection' on Blu-ray4 days ago, 1 comment


Comments (4)
Mark Behar (3:57 PM on Fri Jul 18, 2008)
This upcoming edition of the League of Extraordinary Gentlemen sounds very ambitious. Although I suppose that's Alan Moore's forte...
Neil Ottenstein (4:33 PM on Fri Jul 18, 2008)
I found the second volume of the League of Extraordinary Gentlemen much too mean spirited for my tastes. The concept is definitely intriguing, but somehow I think any future work will also leave a bad taste.
mike weber (5:41 PM on Fri Jul 18, 2008)
Ummm, "Threepenny Opera" is set at the time of the coronation of Victoria.
Quite a few years earlier than Moore apparently thinks it is.
Tom Fitzpatrick (6:05 PM on Fri Jul 18, 2008)
Any chance of a BIG NUMBERS revival?