Wed Jun 18, 2008 4:49PM1 comment ›
Wed Jun 18, 2008 — by Rick Marshall
Exploring Creators' Rights With 'The Incredible Hulk'
What about Ant-Man's discussion of micropayments and licensing agreements?
As a footnote of sorts to his recent review of The Incredible Hulk, Tom Spurgeon of The Comics Reporter made an interesting observation about a potential subtext in the Paramount/Marvel Studios blockbuster.
According to Spurgeon, one particular element in the relationship between the characters of Dr. Bruce Banner and Gen. "Thunderbolt" Ross might be worth a little more exploration -- but don't expect the House of Ideas to lead the discussion:
* in case you were wondering, Incredible Hulk continues Marvel's weird Summer 2008 conversational subtext on creators' rights issues, as General Thunderbolt Ross demands ownership of Bruce Banner's body of work and licensing rights, and turns the Super-Soldier formula over to another work-for-hire creator. I can hardly wait for Thor's exegesis on trademarks and public domain.
Good eye (or ear, in this case), Tom!
Jump to comments (1) ![]()
More News from ComicMix
- 'Twilight Saga: New Moon' takes opening day gross record from 'Dark Knight', midnight record from 'Harry Potter 6'about an hour ago, 0 comments
- The Point Radio: 'Twilight New Moon' Exclusives1 day ago, 0 comments
- Review: 'Saga of the Swamp Thing Book Two'1 day ago, 0 comments
- Why continuity matters, dammit1 day ago, 4 comments
- Capcom Announces 'Resident Evil 5: Gold Edition'3 days ago, 0 comments
- 'Angel: After The Fall' fan film3 days ago, 0 comments
- ComicMix Six: Best Geek-Themed Games for the Holidays3 days ago, 1 comment
- Review: 'Logan's Run' on Blu-ray3 days ago, 0 comments
- ComicMix and IDW on the iPhone and iTouch4 days ago, 0 comments
- 'Global Frequency' back to TV?4 days ago, 3 comments


Comments (1)
Alan Coil (9:50 PM on Wed Jun 18, 2008)
I didn't even notice if Jack Kirby was credited this time. Anybody know?