Wed Jun 18, 2008 4:49PM1 comment ›
Wed Jun 18, 2008 — by Rick Marshall
Exploring Creators' Rights With 'The Incredible Hulk'
What about Ant-Man's discussion of micropayments and licensing agreements?
As a footnote of sorts to his recent review of The Incredible Hulk, Tom Spurgeon of The Comics Reporter made an interesting observation about a potential subtext in the Paramount/Marvel Studios blockbuster.
According to Spurgeon, one particular element in the relationship between the characters of Dr. Bruce Banner and Gen. "Thunderbolt" Ross might be worth a little more exploration -- but don't expect the House of Ideas to lead the discussion:
* in case you were wondering, Incredible Hulk continues Marvel's weird Summer 2008 conversational subtext on creators' rights issues, as General Thunderbolt Ross demands ownership of Bruce Banner's body of work and licensing rights, and turns the Super-Soldier formula over to another work-for-hire creator. I can hardly wait for Thor's exegesis on trademarks and public domain.
Good eye (or ear, in this case), Tom!
Jump to comments (1)
More News from ComicMix
- 'Firefly' Universe Mapped3 hours ago, 1 comment
- 'City of Ember' Coming to DVD in January4 hours ago, 1 comment
- Photoshop for old school comics artists5 hours ago, 2 comments
- Interview: Tim Pilcher Talks Erotica, Part 17 hours ago, 0 comments
- New and Old Fiction Served up at the Book View Cafe8 hours ago, 0 comments
- BBC Opens up 'Doctor Who' Archives9 hours ago, 0 comments
- Does Warren Beatty still have the Dick Tracy rights?11 hours ago, 0 comments
- 'Wanted' Movie Editon Available12 hours ago, 0 comments
- Warner Buys Original SF Thriller20 hours ago, 2 comments
- Manga Friday: Shojo (Slight Return)23 hours ago, 0 comments


Comments (1)
Alan Coil (9:50 PM on Wed Jun 18, 2008)
I didn't even notice if Jack Kirby was credited this time. Anybody know?