Comments (20)

Add a CommentInappropriate or promotional comments may be removed.

Reply
mike weber (7:12 PM on Thu May 8, 2008)

They need to make a "Power Girl" movie.

Cast the right actress and you don't need a script; ask the fanboys what the script was like after the film and they'll go "There were words?"

Reply
Mary Mitchell (9:47 AM on Sat May 10, 2008)

Dude, you just described the plot of every porn flick.

Reply
mike baron (7:18 PM on Thu May 8, 2008)

What about "My Super Ex-Girlfriend?"

Reply
mike weber (10:06 PM on Thu May 8, 2008)

I seem to be one of the few who enjoyed "My Suer Ex-"

Reply
Tom Fitzpatrick (8:51 PM on Thu May 8, 2008)

Didn't they make Elektra awhile ago?

Reply
mike weber (10:06 PM on Thu May 8, 2008)

Errr- "Super"

Reply
mike weber (10:08 PM on Thu May 8, 2008)

I believe so, and - as i recall - it got (deservedly so, apparently) worse reviews then "Super Ex-"

Reply
Keith R.A. DeCandido (10:35 PM on Thu May 8, 2008)

Wonder Woman was on a faster track than Thor right up until Joss Whedon turned in a script the producers didn't like very much and they parted ways. That's not sexism, that's Hollywood inaction (sic), and it happens to films all the time.

The ratio of male-centered hero movies to female-centered ones is about the same as it is in the comic book world, sadly. It doesn't help that the two we have had were Elektra and Catwoman....

Reply
russ carreiro (11:35 PM on Thu May 8, 2008)

The answer is simple: Catwoman.

Reply
Mike Gold (7:59 AM on Fri May 9, 2008)

Still, it's pretty annoying that of all the dozen or so solo superhero movies currently in production or in pre-production, all of them (with the perpetual and arguable exception of Wonder Woman) feature males stars. You'd think by now they'd learn: people want to see good movies, and Elektra, Supergirl and Catwoman were not good movies.

Oh, wait. We're talking about Hollywood. Never mind.

Reply
Russ Rogers (10:27 AM on Fri May 9, 2008)

How far back are we looking? You mentioned "Electra" and "Catwoman," but you didn't go back to "Barb Wire" or "Vampirella." If you go back 25 years, there's "Supergirl," "Sheena" and "Red Sonja." Those three were all 1984 and 1985, the BOOM years of the super-heroine. Does "Brenda Starr" count in this category? Were any of these considered a success?

On TV there has been "The Bionic Woman," (or do we limit our discussion to super heroes from comic books), "Witchblade," "Birds of Prey," "Painkiller Jane," "Dark Angel," "Buffy the Vampire Slayer," "Xena," "Cleopatra 2525" and "Charmed." You can make the argument that "Medium" and "Ghost Whisperer" are both about heroines with super powers. "Sabrina the Teen age Witch"? She's super and from comics, not really a heroine. Recently "Smallville" added "Supergirl." "Heroes" has the Cheerleader. I probably forgetting many. Obviously super-heroines have had greater success on the small screen.

I think Mike Weber should check out the Blinky's "Powergirl" fan films. I think there is more to recommend them than just their star, Tawnya Manion's curves. And I think that "Catwoman" and "Barb Wire" definitely answers the question, "Do Super-heroine movies need more than just a "hot" woman in the title role?" YES. You can't expect drooling boys (no matter what age) to carry a film to box office success. Although I admit, it doesn't hurt to have some drool-factor in your movie.

Other than Wonder Woman, what female comic book characters are deserving of a big, Hollywood screen treatment? Personally, I would rather have seen a "Ghost" movie than "Barb Wire." I would like to see a movie adaptation of Chuck Dixon's, "Evangeline." "Whisper" would make a good movie. "Rose and Thorn," would make a REALLY cool movie or continuing series TV show. IF the next "Hulk" movie is a bigger critical and box office success, is there room for a "SHE-Hulk" movie? It's not just a lack Super-heroine Movies, I think Super-heroines in general are under represented in comics.

Oh, oh, oh .... "Ms. Tree" would ROCK as a movie! Maybe not a super-heroine, but "Ms. Tree, the Movie" would kick butt on V.I. Warshawski! THAT movie was a turd-burger!

Here is one Super-heroine movie that I was unfamiliar with: "Zsazsa Zaturnnah Ze Moveeh" (2006). It's a Super-heroine movie based on an award winning Graphic Novel! Here is the trailer:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WrAQ8-WzZ0w

I've only seen the trailer and read a bit about the production on Wikipedia, but this looks SPECTACULAR! Totally bizarre. It LOOKS entertaining, like an "experience" to experience. For gosh sakes, it's a MUSICAL! In other words, Rick Marshall, "Oh, My. God!" (Does Zaturnnah qualify as a super-heroine even if her secret alter-ego is a gay, male hairdresser?) I just need to find out where I can get a DVD copy with English subtitles! And I need to find an English translation of the Graphic Novel. From what I've read, the book is a spoof on a classic Filipino hero named "Darna." The author, Carlo Vergara, wonders if some of the jokes and cultural references will translate into English.

ComicMix NEEDS to do an article about Zsazsa Zaturnnah. (I'm willing to write it, if somebody is willing to not pay me! Otherwise, Martha, Elayne, Rick, John, Mike? Somebody, RUN with this idea!) If nobody else has published the English translation of Zsazsa Zaturnnah ... ComicMix? Please?

Reply
Mike Gold (11:25 AM on Sat May 10, 2008)

Sadly, most of the superheroine movies you noted suck, IMHO. I'm not sure Ms. Tree counts (one of my favorites, obviously) as a superheroine, but damn, she should. There's an option out for a teevee movie/pilot; it's not my place to reveal details but I know more about it than I should.

I hate to tease like this -- well, you've got me, that's an outright lie -- but please stay turned to ComicMix for more Ms. Tree news. And be patient.

Reply
Andrew Laubacher (10:19 AM on Fri May 9, 2008)

Hollywood executives are like the Sandpeople of STAR WARS, "They are easily frightened. But, they will soon be back; and in greater numbers." Unfortunately, CATWOMAN seems to have poisoned the waters for the time being.

Reply
Peter David (5:22 AM on Fri May 9, 2008)

All I know is that a number of studios have displayed interest in "Fallen Angel" and DC/Warners, which holds the movie rights, have shot down every comer. They continue to hold onto the dramatic rights for themselves...but meanwhile do nothing to develop the property.

PAD

Reply
Mike Gold (11:26 AM on Sat May 10, 2008)

Yep. And the sun came up in the morning.

Reply
russ carreiro (11:22 PM on Fri May 9, 2008)

Honestly though, how many great Superheroine comics are out there? Even Wonder Woman seems silly as a movie to be honest. Even in the pages it comes off cheesy. Maybe if comic books werent stuck in the whole high heel and swimsuit look then it might work but really what self respecting actress is going to take on a role like that after Halle Berry could not even pull it off? The comic book movies that are working out for Hollywood are the ones that lend themselves to CGI type movie making and there aren't any female roles jumping to mind that would be done like that to me.

How many female lead movies get made period? Its an issue outside of the comic adaptions I think.

Reply
mike weber (7:51 PM on Sat May 10, 2008)

You might want to look back at the teevee series with Lynda Carter before you voice such a sweeping put-down of "Wonder Woman" in a visual medium.

Reply
russ carreiro (10:30 PM on Sat May 10, 2008)

I grew up in that era and was probably the target audience for it. That being said, it was terrible then and looks even worse at this point. If they do WW then they need to change her look drastically. No actress with any self respect is going to wear and american flag bathing suit with red high heel boots. It works to some degree in a comic, but in live action its way too campy.

Reply
Alan Coil (7:38 PM on Sat May 10, 2008)

I would argue that Catwoman wasn't THAT bad a movie, but it was a terrible interpretation of DC's Catwoman. I would rate it at 'C', which means it is a movie I would watch again, but definitely not every year.

Reply
Chris Ullrich (9:09 PM on Sat May 10, 2008)

Hollywood studios like to make money. Actresses don't open movies. Actors do. Therefore, you won't see very many movies (especially big-budget superhero action films) featuring females as the main character -- particularly after recent disasters like "Catwoman" and "Elektra.

It just isn't cost-effective for them and no studio exec. wants to take the chance of being the one who green-lit a female-driven "Superheroine" movie that fails to perform. Careers are ruined that way.

Add a comment

Inappropriate or promotional comments may be removed. To create a clickable link, simply type the URL (including http://) and we will make a link for you. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br> tags, but if you're into that kind of thing, you can use any of the following tags: b, i, strong, em, a (href only), p and br.

Click one of the three commenter types below. Member comments are added immediately once you confirm your email address. Anonymous comments are moderated by our editorial staff.

Email me

  

Comment Preview
Avatar
Your Name (1:04 AM on Wed May 14, 2008)

Preview your comment here.

ComicMix Podcasts

this gets replaced with a player